<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en-US" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>andthennothing.net: Tag ajax</title>
  <subtitle type="html">&amp;ldquo;first there was a three-legged monkey...&amp;rdquo;</subtitle>
  <id>tag:andthennothing.net,2005:Typo</id>
  <generator uri="http://typo.leetsoft.com" version="4.0">Typo</generator>
  <link href="http://andthennothing.net/xml/atom10/tag/ajax/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/xml+atom"/>
  <link href="http://andthennothing.net/tags/ajax?tag=ajax" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
  <updated>2007-04-20T01:24:06+00:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <author>
      <name>Jonas Bengtsson</name>
      <email>jonas.b@home.se</email>
    </author>
    <id>urn:uuid:c4463123-7a70-4816-9683-7d3be4767e82</id>
    <published>2005-05-13T01:14:00+00:00</published>
    <updated>2007-04-20T01:24:06+00:00</updated>
    <title>Javascript and links</title>
    <link href="http://andthennothing.net/archives/2005/05/13/javascript-and-links" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
    <category term="javascript" scheme="http://andthennothing.net/tags/ajax"/>
    <category term="http" scheme="http://andthennothing.net/tags/ajax"/>
    <category term="ajax" scheme="http://andthennothing.net/tags/ajax"/>
    <category term="rails" scheme="http://andthennothing.net/tags/ajax"/>
    <category term="webdevelopment" scheme="http://andthennothing.net/tags/ajax"/>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Looking at &lt;a href="http://thedailywtf.com/forums/34300/ShowPost.aspx"&gt;today&amp;#8217;s Daily &lt;span class="caps"&gt;WTF&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; is amusing, where VBScript is used in a tad unnecessary way. Using VB/javascript for something as basic as links makes me cringe. A few years back I read a bit about &lt;a href="http://asp.net/"&gt;ASP.NET&lt;/a&gt; because it was new and for some reason I have been interested in web development frameworks for quite a while. But I didn&amp;#8217;t like it, mostly due to its usage of javascript for links (that&amp;#8217;s at least how I remember it, although my memory might be failing me and &lt;span class="caps"&gt;ASP&lt;/span&gt;.NET might have changed since).&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Nowadays, &lt;a href="http://www.adaptivepath.com/publications/essays/archives/000385.php"&gt;Ajax&lt;/a&gt; is all the rage, and javascript gains popularity. I think that Ajax, &amp;agrave; la &lt;a href="http://gmail.google.com/"&gt;Gmail&lt;/a&gt;, is nice and might have the possibility to transform the web experience to some degree. But still, I don&amp;#8217;t like relying on something fragile as javascript for something basic and fundamental as sending and receiving information. The simplicity of &lt;span class="caps"&gt;HTML&lt;/span&gt; and http is, if you ask me, one of the main reasons of the success of the web.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;When Gmail first came into beeing, it didn&amp;#8217;t work on browsers that didn&amp;#8217;t support &lt;span class="caps"&gt;XML&lt;/span&gt;HttpRequest. Nowadays there is also support for other browsers. &lt;a href="http://www.backpackit.com/"&gt;Backpack&lt;/a&gt; is another Ajaxy web application that doesn&amp;#8217;t support browsers such as Opera. That makes me little nervous since Backpack has been the driving force of the Ajax support in &lt;a href="http://www.rubyonrails.org/"&gt;Ruby on Rails&lt;/a&gt;. I really like RoR so I hope it doesn&amp;#8217;t take a wrong turn. Even though I don&amp;#8217;t fully understand the problem, &lt;a href="http://www.loudthinking.com/arc/000455.html"&gt;javascript generated &lt;span class="caps"&gt;POS&lt;/span&gt;Ts on links&lt;/a&gt; seems wrong.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;m all for experimenting with Ajax to enhance the user experience, but if the browser doesn&amp;#8217;t support what you are trying to do, you should degrade gracefully. Everything else is soo 1998!&lt;/p&gt;</content>
  </entry>
</feed>
